The European Commission has published its proposal on Instant Payments.
This clears the way for widespread adoption of Pay by Bank for ecommerce and allows merchants to benefit from instant funds settlement – a significant upgrade on most other payment methods.
The timelines for implementation are perhaps longer than necessary and at Tink, we are hoping for more rapid adoption.
So what are the key points of the European Commission’s proposal and what does it mean for the payments ecosystem?
All account servicing payment service providers (‘ASPSPs’ or simply #banks) that can send and receive credit transfers must offer an ‘instant’ alternative (PIs and EMIs are excluded due to their limited access to payment systems).
Receiving instant payments needs to be implemented within six months of the regulation being adopted, sending within 12 months (where the latter is required for instant retail payments).
Charges can’t be higher than for non-instant credit transfers (i.e. free where SCT or domestic transfers are free as well, which applies in almost all situations).
Banks have to help prevent payments going missing, by alerting the user to any discrepancies between beneficiary IBAN and beneficiary name before completing initiation (unless users have opted out of this service).
Sender and receiver banks shall do sanction checks at least daily, but not as part of an instant payment itself.
For open banking payments, the mandatory adoption of instant payments allows us to give merchants instant confirmation and verification that the transaction has been executed and settled – clearing the way to wider adoption of ‘Pay by Bank’ for ecommerce.
Merchants benefit from instant funds settlement – a significant upgrade on most other payment methods.
The timelines for implementation are perhaps longer than necessary. Most banks can already receive and send instant payments through TIPS and RT1 interbank infrastructure – so we are hoping for more rapid adoption.
We like the requirement for banks to monitor customers – not transactions – against sanction lists, helping to keep the payments ecosystem safe.
In principle, forcing use of confirmation of payee (‘CoP’) attaching the name and IBAN of the payee against a central directory, could help address financial crime – but uncontrolled adoption of CoP could create unwanted friction for users across channels. Alternatively, the use of transaction risk indicators could help banks meet their CoP obligations without impacting the user experience.
2024-09-24
4 min read
Pay by Bank offers a solution that addresses the potentially higher transaction fees and fraud risks while enhancing the customer experience for luxury retailers.
Read more
2024-09-03
5 min read
We spoke to Nordea Product Manager Sami Mikkonen about enhancing their mobile app using open banking technology, focusing on improving consumer engagement and financial management.
Read more
2024-07-29
6 min read
In the second article of this series, we focus on why leading Payment Service Providers (PSPs) – like Adyen and Stripe – are introducing Pay by Bank to their checkout options (and why this is important for their merchants too).
Read more
Contact our team to learn more about what we can help you build – or create an account to get started right away.